Furry Brown Dog

Dedicated to the memory of my canine friend…

Biased reporting in the Straits Times

with 14 comments

I’m not sure what to make of counter protests by the Straits Times and its apologists that it reported the Hougang by-election coverage objectively and dispassionately. Yes those are the words used by the Straits Times editor in its reply to WP’s Low here. As previously written, when then MM Lee Kuan Yew slipped up under oath in 2008, the Straits Times could have spun the headline the same way it did for the by-election such as MM Lee made misstatement under oath, or as it did to WP even something like MM Lee faces allegations of perjury.

But what did Straits Times choose to go with instead? A headline firmly on the MM and PAP’s side: Govt rebuts law group’s attack on S’pore judiciary. Why the inconsistency, Straits Times?

A former Straits Times journalist curiously stated it isn’t just the opposition figures who complain about biased coverage. Apparently the PAP does too, and no less by heavyweight ministers:

Lest people think that only the opposition complains about headlines, well, the PAP does too but maybe not as publicly. I don’t know about this by-election or even the last general election, but I’ve had to face the ire of PAP heavyweights who complain about unflattering pictures or supposedly misleading headlines during past polls or the amount of acreage given to the opposition. Yes, the PAP complains too about media bias.

Then the question here is, why doesn’t the Straits Times make such complaints and their dealings public? Why couldn’t the editor make a decision to publish the content of the PAP complaints together with its editor’s replies and let the public make their own judgement as to whether the Straits Times was consistent and fair in their election coverage? Must it be settled behind closed doors over hushed whispers? As though the Straits Times are politically subservient to the PAP?

Photo choice and placement is another issue. As noted by another blogger here, it’s quite telling that the Straits Times tended to portray Desmond Choo together with his constituents, but of Png simply campaigning for votes.

Let’s review a couple more recent instances of biased articles from the Straits Times. Earlier this year there was this: Did Singaporeans over-react to MRT breakdowns? The article suggests that Singaporeans went over the top in demanding that then-SMRT CEO Saw Phaik Hwa resign after train service broke down repeatedly in December 2011. But something surprising happened less than a week later which vindicated those calling for Saw’s resignation: Saw actually resigned. What happened, Straits Times? If Singaporeans were indeed complaining as the spoilt brats they were made out to be, why did Saw have to resign?

Or take this example from earlier this January, where the Straits Times declared that President Tony Tan volunteers to take 51% pay cut. Volunteer? Why couldn’t the headline have been written as President Tan accepts pay cut recommendations? Why the need to spin it as a selfless gesture on Tony Tan’s part?

However ST apologists want to spin it, it becomes very hard to deny that the Straits Times is biased in its reporting and coverage through selective use of headlines, photo choice and placement.

Written by defennder

May 30, 2012 at 8:48 PM

Posted in Singapore affairs

14 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. The fact The Straits Times (and all other SPH newspapers for that matter) is biased is undeniable. The only area for possible dispute is how baised they are!!

    The denials by editors of ST and Lianhe Zaobao are futile because their past reportings are ample proof that they serve PAP.

    Gatecrash

    May 31, 2012 at 10:50 AM

  2. These are not the only lapses and evidence for biased reporting by these self-proclaimed ‘professional journalists’ trying to be politically neutral:

    1) When some PAP bigwig claims that S$1k could sustain the purchase of a HDB flat – the very next day, the ST had this on the headlines. The report was also biased as it did not take into account the various other expenses a family might require besides a place to stay (e.g., CPF for retirement). Objective reporting? Hardly.

    2) When some PAP bigwig claims that Hougang BE result did not reflect the political sentiments of Singapore on the whole – loh and behold, an ST editor (with insufficient originality) regurgitates the same idea in a ST column.

    3) I know someone had actually done an empirical study on this and posted it online but we all know this to be true – in GE2011, compare the press space deovated to PAP candidates with that of non-PAP candidates. Pages and pages devoted to PAP candidates like they were pop idols.

    4) The recent picture illustrating the PAP accusations of WP being dishonest – of ALL pictures featuring LTK, Slyvia and Png in their various activities, ST had to feature one that smacks of dishonest inneuendoes – did you think the public did not get this ‘below-the-waist’ cheapshot? What is ST but some small city newsletter of the PAP that resorts to such gutter journalism?

    Up your standards further ST – you have alot to make a case for yourself as politically neutral and objective. Talk is cheap. If I were a ST journalist, I would be ashamed of myself for disgracing the profession. Really. Unless of course, you did not know what being objective truly means.

    Duh

    May 31, 2012 at 1:18 PM

  3. Two must ‘haves’ to be an ST journalist:
    1. must have NO intellectual honesty
    2. must have NO intellectual curiosity

    george

    May 31, 2012 at 11:15 PM

  4. Actually, it’s not even worth commenting (although I’m doing it) because the biasness is so blatant and obvious, it’s amazing they can even bother to deny it! When you live in the West, articles criticising the government and leaders are so commomplace but here, it is almost non-existent. In Singapore, our media has shirked, no abandoned, its responsibilities and is simply acting as a cheerleader for the government!

    Bornbred Singaporean

    June 2, 2012 at 10:03 AM

  5. Thank you, I have recently been searching for info approximately this topic for
    ages and yours is the best I have discovered till now.
    However, what about the bottom line? Are you positive in regards
    to the supply?

    Orlando Chiropractor

    June 25, 2013 at 12:57 AM

  6. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your sites
    really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back down the road. Cheers

  7. Very good website you have here but I was wanting to know if you
    knew of any message boards that cover the same topics talked about in this
    article? I’d really love to be a part of group where I can get advice from other experienced people that share the same interest. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Thanks!

    Karine

    July 11, 2013 at 5:12 AM

  8. The are two methods that can be used to buy stocks.

    The first way is to purchase stocks through Dividend Reinvestment Plans or Direct Investment Plans.

    Since not all companies offer a Dividend Reinvestment Plan
    or Direct Investment Plan, the other way to purchase
    stocks is by using a brokerage house. When it comes to
    brokerages, there are full service brokerages and
    discount brokerages. If money is not a consideration,
    full service brokerages offer more assistance than the discount brokerages.

    __________________________________________________________________________

    I love stock market timing

    stock market timing

    July 17, 2013 at 8:11 PM

  9. Hi there! Someone in my Myspace group shared this site with us so I came
    to check it out. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m bookmarking
    and will be tweeting this to my followers! Fantastic blog
    and amazing design.

  10. Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is
    a very well written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I will definitely comeback.

    Ernesto

    August 4, 2013 at 12:48 PM

  11. Browsing stumbleupon.com I noticed your site bookmarked as: Biased reporting in the Straits Times
    | Furry Brown Dog. Now i’m assuming you bookmarked it yourself and wanted to ask if social book-marking gets you a large amount of visitors? I’ve been looking
    at doing some social bookmarking for a few of my sites but wasn’t sure if it would yield any positive results. Thank you so much.

  12. When someone writes an piece of writing he/she keeps the plan
    of a user in his/her brain that how a user can be aware
    of it. Therefore that’s why this article is amazing. Thanks!

    Norman

    August 28, 2013 at 4:38 PM

  13. If some one needs to be updated with most recent technologies then he must be visit this site and be
    up to date all the time.

    Linwood

    August 30, 2013 at 5:00 AM

  14. We stumbled over here from a different web page and thought I might check things out.
    I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward to finding out about your web page yet again.

    eminata group

    March 8, 2014 at 4:01 PM


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: